|
Determining Under the Influence Just Because an Officer Says Doesn't Make it So
When it comes down to determining whether someone is under the influence of alcohol or another drug,
it is common to think that the only opinion that matters is the arresting officer's. That is not true,
however. The driver himself has just as worthy of an opinion as to whether he is impaired. The Court,
then, will determine credibility and the conclusion is not always a given.
It should come as no surprise that law enforcement personnel have a motivation, even an incentive, to arrest
people for DUI or DWI. First, they will explain that it is their duty to uphold the law, which is true.
What many of them will not admit is that sometimes their official reviews for promotion take into account
how many DUI arrests they have and that some departments have even dealt with the issue of having a minimum
quota of DUI arrests. In fact, arresting people for DUI is so popular among certain groups that there
are national awards given to the cops with the highest number of DUI arrests. So, to say there is a little
pride going into every traffic stop for DUI is an understatement.
Therefore, when an officer takes the stand to tell the judge that a driver was too drunk to drive, is that
an end all? Not necessarily.
In People v. Bavas, 191 Ill.Dec.286, 623 N.E.2d 876 (2 Dist. 1993), the defendant driver told the judge that
he had only two beers during a four hour period. The defendant's statement was not controverted by anyone.
Although the officer stated the defendant was under the influence of alcohol, the defendant disagreed and the
judge believed the defendant. The judge found that the officer had no reasonable grounds to have the defendant
arrested, thereby dismissing the case.
A similar result occurred in the People v. Kuntz, 180 Ill.Dec.419, 607 N.E.2d 313 (3 Dist. 1993), where that
defendant driver explained that he had consumed a minimal amount of alcohol and that he was not under the
influence of alcohol. Before dismissing the case for no reasonable grounds, the judge further found that
the driver was able to perform field sobriety testing.
The moral of the story is that, if you are arrested for DUI or DWI, your own words are important, as well as
your actions. A skilled local DUI attorney can present your case in a light most favorable to you and in
complete contrast to the arresting officer's version.
If you or someone you know gets charged with a DUI or a DWI, a common legal inquiry that should be asked by a
competent attorney is did the officer have "probable cause", or a good reason, to make the arrest?
It is important to retain an attorney who is highly experienced in Illinois DUI law. In addition, your attorney
must be familiar with the county in which you are charged. Your Lee County DUI Attorney may be able to challenge
various portions of summary suspension. In addition to challenging the suspension, your Lee County DUI Attorney
may able to have the criminal case dismissed or reduced from a DUI.
CLick
the State to Find a DUI Attorney in Your Area
Local Attorney, LTD.
2100 Manchester Road
Suite 900-Office 113
Wheaton, IL 60187
630-925-7188 Office
630-829-7138 Fax
pbuh.local.attorney@gmail.com
|